Within the animal kingdom this appears to be a primitive condition. More advanced animals have symmetry.
Groups that are traditionally named are shown on the right; they form an "ascending series" per Clark, see aboveand several groups are paraphyletic: Thus, the members of the two sets of groups, and hence names, do not match, which causes problems in relating scientific names to common usually traditional names.
Consider the superfamily Hominoidea: In terms of the common names on the right, this group consists of apes and humans and there is no single common name for all the members of the group.
One remedy is to create a new common name, in this case "hominoids". Another possibility is to expand the use of one of the traditional names. For example, in his book, the vertebrate palaeontologist Benton wrote, "The apes, Hominoidea, today include the gibbons and orang-utan In that case, the group heretofore called "apes" must now be identified as the "non-human apes".
As of [update]there is no consensus as to which methodology will rule, whether to accept traditional that is, commonbut paraphyletic, names or to use monophyletic names only; or to use 'new' common names or adaptations of old ones.
Both competing approaches will be found in biological sources, often in the same work, and sometimes by the same author.
Thus, Benton defines "apes" to include humans, then he repeatedly uses "ape-like" to mean "like an ape rather than a human"; and when discussing the reaction of others to a new fossil he writes of "claims that Orrorin The chimpanzee in the upper left is brachiating ; the orangutan at the bottom center is knuckle-walking.
Homo sapiens are the only living primate species that is fully bipedal Nilgiri langur Trachypithecus johniian Old World monkey A list of the families of the living primates is given below, together with one possible classification into ranks between order and family.
For example, an alternative classification of the living Strepsirrhini divides them into two infraorders, Lemuriformes and Lorisiformes.The two fundamental objectives in the evolutionary game of life are to first survive (natural selection) and then to mate (sexual selection).
For sexually reproducing species, including humans. Does the bird have episodic memory for episodes other than caching, for attracting a mate, avoiding predators, etc.?
Do either of the two basic evolutionary models for altruism—kin selection a wind that blows out a flame, etc., to events that humans recognize as causal. Does the animal make the human transition, or does its sense of.
Polygamy linked to reproductive longevity, involving colonies with a single reproductive individual, is a recurrent pattern in the animal kingdom. For example, in eusocial insects such as ants, where queens can attain great longevity (e.g. up to 28 years in the black garden ant Lasius niger) [ 26 ].
It was the peacock’s train that apparently set Charles Darwin to thinking about the workings of how a special kind of natural selection he called “sexual selection” might operate and how a sense of esthetic beauty might have evolved, among birds AND humans.
Within the animal kingdom several evolutionary trends and advancements are seen. Note that not all animal groups have all of the organs and organ systems found in the "higher animals", a fact consistent with stepwise evolutionary history. A Comparison of the Mate Selection Pattern of the Humans and the Rest of the Animal Kingdom PAGES 2.
WORDS View Full Essay. More essays like this: homosapiens, sexual reproduction, mate selction pattern. Sign up to view the rest of the essay. Read the full essay.