Audi used this in their Green Police Ads. Essentially the gestapo in smart cars. Predictably, many environmentalists were offended and claimed that the ad had Unfortunate Implicationsapparently not realizing that it was just a gag.
From the nature of things, every society must at all times possess within itself the sovereign powers of legislation. The whole art of government consists in the art of being honest. History has informed us that bodies of men, as well as individuals, are susceptible of the spirit of tyranny.
There are extraordinary situations which require extraordinary interposition.
An exasperated people, who feel that they possess power, are not easily restrained within limits strictly regular. When the representative body have lost the confidence of their constituents, when they have notoriously made sale of their most valuable rights, when they have assumed to themselves powers which the people never put into their hands, then indeed their continuing in office becomes dangerous to the state, and calls for an exercise of the power of dissolution.
The feelings of human nature revolt against the supposition of a state so situated as that it may not in any emergency provide against dangers which perhaps threaten immediate ruin. While those bodies are in existence to whom the people have delegated the powers of legislation, they alone possess and may exercise those powers; but when they are dissolved by the lopping off one or more of their branches, the power reverts to the people, who may exercise it to unlimited extent, either assembling together in person, sending deputies, or in any other way they may think proper.
From the nature and purpose of civil institutions, all the lands within the limits which any particular society has circumscribed around itself are assumed by that society, and subject to their allotment only. This may be done by themselves, assembled collectively, or by their legislature, to whom they may have delegated sovereign authority; and if they are alloted in neither of these ways, each individual of the society may appropriate to himself such lands as he finds vacant, and occupancy will give him title.
A free people [claim] their rights, as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief magistrate.
Let those flatter who fear; it is not an American art. To give praise which is not due might be well from the venal, but would ill beseem those who are asserting the rights of human nature.
They know, and will therefore say, that kings are the servants, not the proprietors of the people. The God who gave us life gave us liberty at the same time; the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them. For more quotes from and about this document, see United States Declaration of Independence For the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.
When, in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
Known as the "anti-slavery clause", this section drafted by Thomas Jefferson was removed from the Declaration at the behest of representatives of South Carolina. Murdering the people upon whom he also obtruded them, thus paying off former crimes committed against the liberties of one people, with crimes which he urges them to commit against the lives of another.
In every stage of these repressions, we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms, our repreated petitions have been answered only by repreated injury. It does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty godsor no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.
What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to factspardon and pacify them.One evening over dinner, I began to joke, as I often had before, about writing an essay called “Men Explain Things to Me.” Every writer has a stable of ideas that never make it to the racetrack, and I’d been trotting this pony out recreationally every once in a while.
A Parody of the Declaration of Independence for Golfers PAGES 1. WORDS View Full Essay. Sign up to view the complete essay. Show me the full essay.
Show me the full essay. More essays like this: declaration of independence for golfers. Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin - Alfredo Alvarez, student @ Miami University. The most fortunate of us, in our journey through life, frequently meet with calamities and misfortunes which may greatly afflict us; and, to fortify our minds against the attacks of these calamities and misfortunes, should be one of the principal studies and endeavours of our lives.
Essay on Declaration of Independence Essay on Declaration of Independence The 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence, what was to become one of the most important and influencial documents in history, agreed to "mutually pledge to each other, our .
THE SPIKE. It was late-afternoon. Forty-nine of us, forty-eight men and one woman, lay on the green waiting for the spike to open. We were too tired to talk much. Stanton’s parody of Thomas Jefferson’s “Declaration of Independence” effectively captures the attention of her audience on gender inequality.
Because the Declaration of Independence is such a well-known and sacred piece, her commentary on the sexual discrimination of Jefferson’s work .