Relationship of selected anthropometric measurement with

Results Anthropometric characteristics of participants athletes and non-athletes are presented in Table 1. In our previous study, to identify adipose tissue the old and new anthropometric indices were compared.

Relationship of selected anthropometric measurement with

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution Licensewhich permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract Historical dimensions for the cubit are provided by scripture and pyramid documentation. Additional dimensions from the Middle East are found in other early documents. Two major dimensions emerge from a history of the cubit. The first is the anthropological or short cubit, and the second is the architectual or long cubit.

The wide geographical area and long chronological period suggest that cubit dimensions varied over time and geographic area. Greek and Roman conquests led to standardization. More recent dimensions are provided from a study by Francis Galton based upon his investigations into anthropometry.

Contemporary dimensions from military and civilian anthropometry for the forearm and hand allow comparison to the ancient unit. Acquaintance with Egyptian history might have brought some awareness from the dimensions given for pyramids and temples.

The cubit was a common unit in the early East. It continues today in some locations, but with less prominence having been replaced by modern day units. Early employment of the cubit throughout the Near East showed varied dimensions for this unit. Some variants can be examined easier with reference to biblical passages.

Additional variants can also be found in numerous secular documents, but these are less known and less accessible than scripture.

The cubit is based upon a human characteristic—the length of the forearm from the tip of the middle finger to end of the elbow. Many definitions seem to agree on this aspect of the unit, yet it does not produce a universal standard for there are many ways to determine a cubit.

It can be measured from the elbow to the base of the hand, from the elbow to a distance located between the outstretched thumb and little finger, or from the elbow to the tip of the middle finger.

These alternate descriptions further complicate the matter of determining a specific unit measure of the cubit. Hereafter, the latter description, elbow to the tip of the middle finger, will signify the common unit.

The human figure typically male has been the basis for many dimensions. The foot is immediately recognized as an example [ 1 ]. Less commonly heard is onyx nailbut onyx remains a medical term. The Old English ynche, ynch, unce, or inch was a thumb-joint breadth.

Small wonder the cubit was initially employed for measurement given its omnipresent availability for use.

Relationship of selected anthropometric measurement with

We always possess the unit. Human figure units are arbitrary but universal are especially effective by their bodily reference producing a crude standard that is immediately accessable.

The cubit provides a convenient middle unit between the foot and the yard. This is a useful way of measuring cloth held center body to an outstretched hand two cubitsor across the body to both outstretched hands four cubits as specified in Exodus The English ell is a larger variant of the cubit consisting of 15 palms, cm, or 45 inches.

It is about equal to the cloth measure ell of early Scotland. The dimensions in Table 1 give the approximate relative lengths for meter, yard, cubit, and foot.

The relative lengths of four common dimensions. The cubit was a basic unit in early Israel and the surrounding Near East countries. Selected biblical references [ 4 ] for the cubit include these five rather well-known selections.

The purpose of the study was to determine the relationship of anthropometric characteristics and kinematics variables with spiking of volleyball players. 2. Methodology The purpose of present study is to investigate the relationship between aerobic power and body composition and few selected anthropometric measurements, among non-athletic female students ( years) in city of Tehran Iran. Comparison of selected anthropometric variables between tribal and non-tribal school players of The term anthropometry refers to measurement of human body in terms of the dimensions of bone, muscle, and adipose (fat) tissue. physical characteristics and their relationship .

Make yourself an ark of gopher wood; make rooms in the ark, and cover it inside and out with pitch.Anthropometric measurement was done using SECA body meter and portable weighing scale. Respondents were weighed with light clothing without footwear. When measuring height, the respondents were to stand upright barefooted on a flat surface with their .

Framingham Heart Study - Wikipedia

Anthropometry is the study and technique of taking body is used widely to measure the nutritional status of individuals or populations. This chapter outlines how anthropometric research can be used for assessing nutrition problems, examines key considerations in anthropometric assessments and presents several applications of anthropometry in reducing risks in different.

The body fat percentage (BFP) of a human or other living being is the total mass of fat divided by total body mass, times ; body fat includes essential body fat and storage body plombier-nemours.comial body fat is necessary to maintain life and reproductive functions. The percentage of essential body fat for women is greater than that for men, due to the .

This study had two objectives: 1) to establish magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a tool for measuring total and regional adipose tissue (AT) distribution in humans and 2) to assess the relationship between selected anthropometric variables and MRI-measured AT.

In contrast to two-compartment and anthropometric methods, DEXA is one method that has shown promise for assessing body composition in young people. In a study of children and adolescents, there was a predictable relationship between DEXA and a four-compartment reference method for measuring percent body fat; this relationship was not.

Data was statistically analysed using Mann Whitney Utechnique to test anthropometric measurement independently,chi square test Among the newborn babies selected, % are female and % are male babies, term babies are % and preterm babies Narendra K.S MadhuG.N,plombier-nemours.comonship of Anthropometric parameters of Newborn.

Relationship of selected anthropometric measurement with
Nutrition Indicators for Development